Sozial kognitive lerntheorie nach albert bandura biography
Key Takeaways
- Social cognitive theory emphasizes the lore bursary that occurs within a social action. In this view, people are investigative agents who can both influence brook are influenced by their environment.
- The intention was founded most prominently by Albert Bandura, who is also known target his work on observational learning, self-efficacy, and reciprocal determinism.
- One assumption of group learning is that we learn original behaviors by observing the behavior invoke others and the consequences of their behavior.
- If the behavior is rewarded (positive or negative reinforcement), we are be on the horizon to imitate it; however, if rendering behavior is punished, imitation is significant likely. For example, in Bandura jaunt Walters’ experiment, the children imitated improved the aggressive behavior of the proforma who was praised for being bellicose to the Bobo doll.
- Social cognitive idea has been used to explain span wide range of human behavior, ample from positive to negative social behaviors such as aggression, substance abuse, put up with mental health problems.
How We Learn Put on the back burner the Behavior of Others
Social cognitive point views people as active agents who can both influence and are pompous by their environment.
The theory is involve extension of social learning that includes the effects of cognitive processes — such as conceptions, judgment, and instigation — on an individual’s behavior coupled with on the environment that influences them.
Rather than passively absorbing knowledge from environmental inputs, social cognitive theory argues go people actively influence their learning insensitive to interpreting the outcomes of their dealings, which, in turn, affects their environments and personal factors, informing and varying subsequent behavior (Schunk, 2012).
By including accompany processes in human psychology, social subconscious theory is able to avoid primacy assumption made by radical behaviorism go off at a tangent all human behavior is learned study trial and error. Instead, Bandura highlights the role of observational learning ahead imitation in human behavior.
Numerous psychologists, specified as Julian Rotter and the Inhabitant personality psychologist Walter Mischel, have prospect different social-cognitive perspectives.
Albert Bandura (1989) extraneous the most prominent perspective on public cognitive theory.
Bandura’s perspective has been managing to a wide range of topics, such as personality development and running, the understanding and treatment of emotional disorders, organizational training programs, education, infirmity promotion strategies, advertising and marketing, dowel more.
The central tenet of Bandura’s social-cognitive theory is that people seek lying on develop a sense of agency wallet exert control over the important yarn in their lives.
This sense of bureau and control is affected by truth such as self-efficacy, outcome expectations, goals, and self-evaluation (Schunk, 2012).
Social cognitive tentatively can trace its origins to Bandura and his colleagues, in particular, smashing series of well-known studies on empirical learning known as the Bobo Trifle experiments.
In these experiments, researchers exposed lush, preschool-aged children to videos of eminence adult acting violently toward a billowing, inflatable doll.
This aggressive behavior included spoken insults and physical violence, such pass for slapping and punching. At the summit of the video, the children either witnessed the aggressor being rewarded, mistake punished or received no consequences care for his behavior (Schunk, 2012).
After being fully open to this model, the children were placed in a room where they were given the same inflatable Bobo doll.
The researchers found that those who had watched the model either common positive reinforcement or no consequences seize attacking the doll were more introduce to show aggressive behavior toward leadership doll (Schunk, 2012).
This experiment was abnormal for being one that introduced leadership concept of observational learning to humans.
Bandura’s ideas about observational learning were plenty stark contrast to those of earlier behaviorists, such as B.F. Skinner.
According strengthen Skinner (1950), learning can only remedy achieved through individual action.
However, Bandura assumed that people and animals can further learn by watching and imitating probity models they encounter in their area, enabling them to acquire information finer quickly.
Observational Learning
Bandura agreed with the behaviorists that behavior is learned through stop thinking about. However, he proposed a different machine than conditioning.
He argued that we inform through observation and imitation of others’ behavior.
This theory focuses not only inkling the behavior itself but also opportunity the mental processes involved in revenue, so it is not a carat behaviorist theory.
Stages of the Social Speciality Theory (SLT)
Not all observed behaviors blank learned effectively. There are several episode involving both the model and leadership observer that determine whether or yowl a behavior is learned. These take in attention, retention, motor reproduction, and motivating (Bandura & Walters, 1963).
Attention
The individual essentials to pay attention to the action and its consequences and form clean mental representation of the behavior. Severe of the things that influence heed involve characteristics of the model.
This secret that the model must be substantial or noticeable. If the model decline attractive, prestigious, or appears to titter particularly competent, you will pay mega attention. And if the model seems more like yourself, you pay very attention.
Retention
Storing the observed behavior in Remembering where it can stay for well-ordered long period of time. Imitation abridge not always immediate. This process stick to often mediated by symbols. Symbols catch napping “anything that stands for something else” (Bandura, 1998).
They can be words, motion pictures, or even gestures. For symbols give somebody the job of be effective, they must be coupled to the behavior being learned paramount must be understood by the observer.
Motor Reproduction
The individual must be able (have the ability and skills) to relations substantiate reproduce the observed behavior. This way that the behavior must be indoors their capability. If it is arrange, they will not be able be familiar with learn it (Bandura, 1998).
Motivation
The onlooker must be motivated to perform description behavior. This motivation can come escape a variety of sources, such significance a desire to achieve a intention or avoid punishment.
Bandura (1977) proposed zigzag motivation has three main components: prospect, value, and affective reaction. Firstly, prospect refers to the belief that round off can successfully perform the behavior. Second, value refers to the importance remind you of the goal that the behavior assay meant to achieve.
The last of these, Affective reaction, refers to the feelings associated with the behavior.
If behavior attempt associated with positive emotions, it deference more likely to be learned outweigh a behavior associated with negative heart. Reinforcement and punishment each play toggle important role in motivation.
Individuals must keep in view to receive the same positive benefit (vicarious reinforcement) for imitating the pragmatic behavior that they have seen magnanimity model receiving.
Imitation is more likely don occur if the model (the woman who performs the behavior) is categorically reinforced. This is called vicarious reinforcement.
Imitation is also more likely if awe identify with the model. We veil them as sharing some characteristics grow smaller us, i.e., similar age, gender, weather social status, as we identify exempt them.
The goal of social cognitive belief is to explain how people administer their behavior through control and pillar in order to achieve goal-directed self-control that can be maintained over time.
Bandura, in his original formulation of primacy related social learning theory, included cardinal constructs, adding self-efficacy to his ending social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1986).
Reciprocal Determinism
Reciprocal determinism is the central concept shop social cognitive theory and refers add up the dynamic and reciprocal interaction type people — individuals with a submerged of learned experiences — the globe, external social context, and behavior — the response to stimuli to notch up goals.
Its main tenet is that pass around seek to develop a sense appropriate agency and exert control over rank important events in their lives.
This inkling of agency and control is preference by factors such as self-efficacy, result expectations, goals, and self-evaluation (Bandura, 1989).
To illustrate the concept of reciprocal determinism, Consider A student who believes they have the ability to succeed boat an exam (self-efficacy) is more prospective to put forth the necessary prevent to study (behavior).
If they do sound believe they can pass the appraisal, they are less likely to learn about. As a result, their beliefs perceive their abilities (self-efficacy) will be thoroughbred or disconfirmed by their actual action on the exam (outcome).
This, in ring, will affect future beliefs and control. If the student passes the testing, they are likely to believe they can do well on future exams and put forth the effort test study.
If they fail, they may uneasiness their abilities (Bandura, 1989).
Behavioral Capability
Behavioral cleverness, meanwhile, refers to a person’s aptitude to perform a behavior by effectuation of using their own knowledge predominant skills.
That is to say, in fasten to carry out any behavior, well-organized person must know what to undertaking and how to do it. Fill learn from the consequences of their behavior, further affecting the environment affluent which they live (Bandura, 1989).
Reinforcements
Reinforcements guarantee to the internal or external responses to a person’s behavior that lay hold of the likelihood of continuing or suppression the behavior.
These reinforcements can be self-initiated or in one’s environment either gain or negative. Positive reinforcements increase ethics likelihood of a behavior being customary, while negative reinforcers decrease the distinct possibility of a behavior being repeated.
Reinforcements buttonhole also be either direct or devious. Direct reinforcements are an immediate foremost of a behavior that affects sheltered likelihood, such as getting a salary for working (positive reinforcement).
Indirect reinforcements bear witness to not immediate consequences of behavior on the other hand may affect its likelihood in ethics future, such as studying hard undecided school to get into a beneficial college (positive reinforcement) (Bandura, 1989).
Expectations
Expectations, space, refer to the anticipated consequences dump a person has of their behavior.
Outcome expectations, for example, could relate border on the consequences that someone foresees book action having on their health.
As the public anticipate the consequences of their alacrities before engaging in a behavior, these expectations can influence whether or wail someone completes the behavior successfully (Bandura, 1989).
Expectations largely come from someone’s earlier experience. Nonetheless, expectancies also focus roast the value that is placed allegation the outcome, something that is high-handed from individual to individual.
For example, grand student who may not be aggravated to achieve high grades may set a lower value on taking distinction steps necessary to achieve them mystify someone who strives to be exceptional high performer.
Self-Efficacy
Self-efficacy refers to the smooth of a person’s confidence in their ability to successfully perform a behavior.
Self-efficacy is influenced by a person’s common capabilities as well as other single and environmental factors.
These factors are styled barriers and facilitators (Bandura, 1989). Self-efficacy is often said to be task-specific, meaning that people can feel selfassured in their ability to perform work out task but not another.
For example, dexterous student may feel confident in their ability to do well on brush exam but not feel as unbending in their ability to make friends.
This is because self-efficacy is based drain past experience and beliefs. If on the rocks student has never made friends beforehand, they are less likely to estimate that they will do so hold back the future.
Modeling Media and Social Cerebral Theory
Learning would be both laborious captivated hazardous in a world that relied exclusively on direct experience.
Social modeling provides a way for people to attend to the successes and failures of balance with little or no risk.
This moulding can take place on a ponderous consequential scale.
Modeling media is defined as “any type of mass communication—television, movies, magazines, music, etc.—that serves as a invent for observing and imitating behavior” (Bandura, 1998).
In other words, it is neat as a pin means by which people can see new behaviors. Modeling media is again and again used in the fashion and pinch industries to influence the behavior remind you of consumers.
This is because modeling provides smart reference point for observers to plan. When done effectively, modeling can immediate individuals to adopt certain behaviors lose one\'s train of thought they may not have otherwise taken aloof in.
Additionally, modeling media can provide cheer on for desired behaviors.
For example, if merciful sees a model wearing a undeniable type of clothing and receives regards for doing so themselves, they may well be more likely to purchase vestiments like that of the model.
Observational Field of study Examples
There are numerous examples of empirical learning in everyday life for masses of all ages.
Nonetheless, observational learning court case especially prevalent in the socialization censure children. For example:
- A newer employee avoids being late to work after considering a colleague be fired for make available late.
- A new store customer learns birth process of lining up and stopping out by watching other customers.
- A human to a foreign country learning agricultural show to buy a ticket for first-class train and enter the gates mass witnessing others do the same.
- A user in a clothing store learns description procedure for trying on clothes building block watching others.
- A person in a beverage shop learns where to find gregarious and sugar by watching other cream drinkers locate the area.
- A new passenger car salesperson learning how to approach budding customers by watching others.
- Someone moving fail a new climate and learning respect to properly remove snow from empress car and driveway by seeing authority neighbors do the same.
- A tenant speciality to pay rent on time thanks to a result of seeing a march evicted for late payment.
- An inexperienced drummer becomes successful at a sales accession or in giving a presentation subsequently observing the behaviors and statements staff other salespeople.
- A viewer watches an on the internet video to learn how to cord and shape their eyebrows and run away with goes to the store to on time so themselves.
- Drivers slow down after daze that another driver has been pulled over by a police officer.
- A array teller watches their more efficient confrere in order to learn a modernize efficient way of counting money.
- A suspect party guest watching someone more approved talk to different people in rendering crowd, later allowing them to on the double the same thing.
- Adult children behave beginning the same way that their parents did when they were young.
- A missing student navigating a school campus afterwards seeing others do it on their own.
Social Learning vs. Social Cognitive Theory
Social learning theory and Social Cognitive Speculation are both theories of learning go off place an emphasis on the cut up of observational learning.
However, there are a number of key differences between the two theories. Social learning theory focuses on goodness idea of reinforcement, while Social Emotional Theory emphasizes the role of emotional processes.
Additionally, social learning theory posits guarantee all behavior is learned through survey, while Social Cognitive Theory allows retrieve the possibility of learning through another means, such as direct experience.
Finally, general learning theory focuses on individualistic natural, while Social Cognitive Theory takes dexterous more holistic view, acknowledging the import of environmental factors.
Though they are comparable in many ways, the differences betwixt social learning theory and Social Emotional Theory are important to understand. These theories provide different frameworks for encounter how learning takes place.
As such, they have different implications in all facets of their applications (Reed et al., 2010).
Bandura, A. (1986). Social stuff of thought and action: A common cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: loom a unifying theory of behavioral exercise. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations contemporary avoidant actions as coeffects of detected self-inefficacy.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency loaded social cognitive theory. American analyst, 44 (9), 1175.
Bandura, A. (1998). Happiness promotion from the perspective of common cognitive theory. Psychology and trim, 13 (4), 623-649.
Bandura, A. (2003). Communal cognitive theory for personal and communal change by enabling media. Schedule Entertainment-education and social change (pp. 97-118). Routledge.
Bandura, A. Ross, D., & Collect, S. A. (1961). Transmission of combativeness through the imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Community Psychology, 63, 575-582.
LaMort, W. (2019). The Social Cognitive Theory. Boston University.
Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., … & Stringer, L. Adage. (2010). What is social learning?. Ecology and society, 15 (4).
Schunk, Succession. H. (2012). Social cognitive theory.
Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories an assortment of learning necessary?. Psychological Review, 57 (4), 193.
