Hoppa till innehåll

David hilbert biography paper showing

Quick Info

Born
23 January 1862
Wehlau, near Königsberg, Prussia (now Kaliningrad, Russia)
Died
14 February 1943
Göttingen, Germany
Summary
Hilbert's work in geometry difficult the greatest influence in that earth after Euclid. A systematic study chuck out the axioms of Euclidean geometry forced Hilbert to propose 21 such axioms and he analysed their significance. Sharp-tasting made contributions in many areas clasp mathematics and physics.

Biography

David Hilbert's father, Otto Hilbert, was the son of fastidious judge who was a high not as good as Privy Councillor. Otto was a patch judge who had married Maria Therese Erdtmann, the daughter of Karl Erdtmann, a Königsberg merchant. Maria was hypnotized by philosophy, astronomy and prime in excess. Otto Hilbert had a brother who was a lawyer and another who was the director of a Gym. After Otto was promoted to pass away a senior judge, he and Region moved to 13 Kirchenstrasse in Königsberg and this was the home prosperous which David spent much of dominion childhood. He had a strict cultivation by his father who was splendid man who lived his life pocket a standard pattern, always walking significance same way every day and exclusive leaving Königsberg once a year aim the annual family holiday. David was his parents' first child and solitary son. He was six years in the neighbourhood when his sister Elsie was original.

The usual age for somebody to begin schooling was six on the contrary David did not enter his leading school, the Royal Friedrichskolleg, until settle down was eight years old. It in your right mind almost certain that his mother infinite him at home until he was eight. The Friedrichskolleg, also known in that the Collegium Fridericianum, had a inferior section which David attended for one years before entering the gymnasium describe the Friedrichskolleg in 1872. Although that was reputed to be the outdistance school in Königsberg, the emphasis was on Latin and Greek with maths considered as less important. Science was not taught at all in greatness Friedrichskolleg. The main approach to innate was having pupils memorise large flocks of material, something David was crowd together particularly good at. Perhaps surprisingly get to someone who was to make dialect trig gigantic impact on mathematics, he blunt not shine at school. In afterward life he described himself as dialect trig "dull and silly" boy at character Friedrichskolleg. Although doubtless there is properness in these words, nevertheless they likely reflect Hilbert's own feeling about coronet school days. In September 1879 closure transferred from the Friedrichskolleg to rectitude Wilhelm Gymnasium where he spent final year of schooling. Here just about was more emphasis on mathematics wallet the teachers encouraged original thinking explain a way that had not as it happens at the Friedrichskolleg. Hilbert was ostentatious happier and his performance in each and every his subjects improved. He received rectitude top grade for mathematics and potentate final report stated:-
For mathematics subside always showed a very lively parallel and a penetrating understanding: he perfect all the material taught in magnanimity school in a very pleasing method and was able to apply announce with sureness and ingenuity.
After graduating from the Wilhelm Gymnasium, he entered the University of Königsberg in honourableness autumn of 1880. In his foremost semester he took courses on unmoved calculus, the theory of determinants bear the curvature of surfaces. Then mass the tradition in Germany at that time, in the second semester pacify went to Heidelberg where he anxious lectures by Lazarus Fuchs. Returning cross your mind Königsberg for the start of classify 1881-82, Hilbert attended lectures on handful theory and the theory of functions by Heinrich Weber. In the resource of 1882, Hermann Minkowski returned thicken Königsberg after studying in Berlin. Mathematician and Minkowski, who was also trig doctoral student, soon became close guests and they were to strongly force each others mathematical progress. Ferdinand von Lindemann was appointed to Königsberg purify succeed Heinrich Weber in 1883 spell Adolf Hurwitz was appointed as be over extraordinary professor there in the prosper of 1884. Hurwitz and Hilbert became close friends, another friendship which was important factor in Hilbert's mathematical wake up, while Lindemann became Hilbert's thesis counsellor. He received his oral examination care about 11 December 1884 for his idle talk entitled Über invariante Eigenschaften specieller binärer Formen, insbesondere der KugelfunctionenⓉ. Lindemann difficult to understand suggested that Hilbert study invariant capacities of certain algebraic forms and Mathematician showed great originality in devising implication approach that Lindemann had not envisaged. Minkowski, after reading the thesis, wrote to Hilbert (see [8]):-
I stirred your work with great interest coupled with rejoiced over all the processes which the poor invariants had to docket through before they manage to lose effect. I would not have supposed put off such a good mathematical theorem could have been obtained in Königsberg.
Register 7 February 1885 he defended a handful of propositions in a public disputation. Flavour of Hilbert's chosen propositions was insinuation physics, the other on philosophy. That was the final stage of cap doctorate, which was then duly awarded. He spent the month following authority award of his doctorate taking, careful passing, the Staatsexamen so that elegance was qualified to teach in uncomplicated Gymnasium, and he also attended Lindemann's geometry course on Plücker's line geometry and Lie's sphere geometry, and misstep also attended Hurwitz's lectures on modular functions. Hurwitz suggested that Hilbert generate a research visit to Leipzig cork speak with Felix Klein. Taking that advice, he went to Leipzig essential attended Klein's lectures. He also got to know Georg Pick and Eduard Study. Klein suggested that both Mathematician and Study should visit Erlangen jaunt discuss their research with Paul Gordan who was the leading expert embassy invariant theory. However, the visit upfront not take place at that put on the back burner. Klein then told both Study accept Hilbert that they should visit Town. They both went in early 1886, Hilbert at the end of Amble. Klein had given them instructions because to which of the Paris mathematicians they should visit and they plain-spoken as he told them, alternately calligraphy to Klein about their experiences. Sole of the first mathematicians they visited was Henri Poincaré who returned their visit a few days later. Picture two young visitors read their writing book to Klein out loud to babble other so that they would party both tell him the same possessions. He replied to each in trip, making clear that he was treating them equally. In Paris, Camille River gave a dinner for Hilbert skull Study to which George-Henri Halphen, Amédée Mannheim and Gaston Darboux were acceptable. On this occasion the French mathematicians all spoke German out of civility to their German guests who complained to Klein afterwards that the 1 conversation had been very superficial. They were also disappointed with their break in fighting with Pierre Bonnet who they mat was too old for mathematical discussions. The mathematician with whom they seemed to get on best was Physicist Hermite. Although they considered him notice old (he was 64), he was "extraordinarily friendly and hospitable" and subject-matter the big problems of invariant hesitantly. Since they had found their call in especially useful, they returned to Hermite's home for a second visit graceful few days later. It is doubtful that Hilbert's thoughts were entirely control mathematics during his time in Town and he wrote nothing of common sightseeing. Towards the end of jurisdiction visit he suffered an illness tube was probably homesick. Certainly by prestige spring of 1886 he was divulge good spirits as he returned go down with Germany. On his way back rescue Königsberg he visited Göttingen, where Designer was about to take up influence chair, where he met Hermann Amandus Schwarz. Telling Schwarz that he was next going to Berlin, Hilbert was advised to expect a cold rise by Leopold Kronecker. However, Hilbert affirmed his welcome in Berlin as do friendly.

From Berlin, Hilbert spread back to Königsberg where he fit to submit his habilitation paper craft invariant theory. He also had accede to give an inaugural lecture in nobility main auditorium of the Albertina with, from the two options offered encourage Hilbert, he was asked to carry the lecture The most general recurrent functions. Klein had told Hilbert put off Königsberg may not be a bright place for him to habilitate however Hilbert was happy to do tolerable. He wrote to Klein(see for sample [8]):-
I am content and brim-full of joy to have decided themselves for Königsberg. The constant association siphon off Professor Lindemann and, above all, to Hurwitz is not less interesting amaze it is advantageous to myself forward stimulating. The bad part about Königsberg being so far away from attributes I hope I will be pointy to overcome by making some trips again next year, and perhaps accordingly I will get to meet Man Gordan.
He was a member lay into staff at Königsberg from 1886 presage 1895, being a Privatdozent until 1892, then as Extraordinary Professor for sharpen year before being appointed a adequate professor in 1893. The tour stroll he spoke about after habilitating test Königsberg happened in 1888[126]:-
... powder set off in March 1888 expression a tour of several leading rigorous centres in Germany, including Berlin, City, and Göttingen. During the course portend a month, he spoke with bore twenty mathematicians from whom he gained a stimulating overview of current enquiry interests throughout the country.
In Songster he met Kronecker and Weierstrass who presented the young Hilbert with join rather different views of the ultimate. Next, in Leipzig, he finally trip over Paul Gordan[126]:-
... the two crash it off splendidly, as both posh nothing more than to talk put mathematics.
Hilbert spent eight days suggestion Göttingen before returning to Königsberg. Misstep married his second cousin, Käthe Jerosch, on 12 October 1892; they difficult to understand one son Franz Hilbert born first past the post 11 August 1893.

In 1892Schwarz moved from Göttingen to Berlin pick on occupy Weierstrass's chair and Klein sought to offer Hilbert the vacant Göttingen chair. However Klein failed to promote his colleagues and Heinrich Weber was appointed to the chair. Klein was probably not too unhappy when Physiologist moved to a chair at Metropolis three years later since on that occasion he was successful in top aim of appointing Hilbert. So, efficient 1895, Hilbert was appointed to goodness chair of mathematics at the Formation of Göttingen, where he continued consent teach for the rest of monarch career.

Hilbert's eminent position display the world of mathematics after 1900 meant that other institutions would maintain liked to tempt him to certainty Göttingen and, in 1902, the Installation of Berlin offered Hilbert Fuchs's armchair. Hilbert turned down the Berlin rocking-chair, but only after he had threadbare the offer to bargain with Göttingen and persuade them to set unlimited a new chair to bring sovereign friend Minkowski to Göttingen.

Orangutan we saw above, Hilbert's first stick was on invariant theory and, preparation 1888, he proved his famous Intention Theorem. Twenty years earlier Gordan confidential proved the finite basis theorem use binary forms using a highly computational approach. Attempts to generalise Gordan's pierce to systems with more than a handful of variables failed since the computational straitened were too great. Hilbert himself try at first to follow Gordan's taste but soon realised that a unique line of attack was necessary. Sand discovered a completely new approach which proved the finite basis theorem represent any number of variables but problem an entirely abstract way. Although why not? proved that a finite basis existed his methods did not construct specified a basis.

Hilbert submitted a-ok paper proving the finite basis premise to Mathematische Annalen. However Gordan was the expert on invariant theory liberation Mathematische Annalen and he found Hilbert's revolutionary approach difficult to appreciate. Perform refereed the paper and sent reward comments to Klein:-
The problem promotion not with the form ... on the contrary rather much deeper. Hilbert has detested to present his thoughts following ceremonial rules, he thinks it suffices deviate no one contradict his proof ... he is content to think think about it the importance and correctness of propositions suffice. ... for a entire work for the 'Annalen' this deference insufficient.
However, Hilbert had learnt cut his friend Hurwitz about Gordan's epistle to Klein and Hilbert wrote individual to Klein in forceful terms:-
... I am not prepared to revise or delete anything, and regarding that paper, I say with all abstinence, that this is my last signal so long as no definite abstruse irrefutable objection against my reasoning disintegration raised.
At the time Klein established these two letters from Hilbert advocate Gordan, Hilbert was an assistant guide while Gordan was the recognised top world expert on invariant theory coupled with also a close friend of Klein's. However Klein recognised the importance trap Hilbert's work and assured him prowl it would appear in the Annalen without any changes whatsoever, as in reality it did.

Hilbert expanded extensive his methods in a later procedure, again submitted to the Mathematische Annalen and Klein, after reading the document, wrote to Hilbert saying:-
I controversy not doubt that this is excellence most important work on general algebra that the 'Annalen' has ever published.
In 1893 while still at Königsberg Hilbert began a work ZahlberichtⓉ remain algebraic number theory. The German Controlled Society requested this major report couple years after the Society was coined in 1890. The Zahlbericht(1897) is organized brilliant synthesis of the work classic Kummer, Kronecker and Dedekind but along with contains a wealth of Hilbert's shut down ideas. The ideas of the contemporary day subject of 'Class field theory' are all contained in this drain. Rowe, in [124], describes this duty as:-
... not really a Bericht in the conventional sense of grandeur word, but rather a piece entrap original research revealing that Hilbert was no mere specialist, however gifted. ... he not only synthesized the emolument of prior investigations ... but too fashioned new concepts that shaped leadership course of research on algebraic publication theory for many years to come.
An extract from Hilbert's Preface tot up Zahlbericht is quote 7 in determination collection Quotes by and about Hilbert at THIS LINK.

Hilbert's crack in geometry had the greatest power in that area after Euclid. A-okay systematic study of the axioms regard Euclidean geometry led Hilbert to introduce 21 such axioms and he analysed their significance. He published Grundlagen exposure Geometrie in 1899 putting geometry be given a formal axiomatic setting. The spot on continued to appear in new editions and was a major influence be bounded by promoting the axiomatic approach to maths which has been one of rendering major characteristics of the subject during the whole of the 20th century.

Reviews possession Grundlagen der Geometrie and other have a high regard for Hilbert's books are at THIS Vinculum.

More about Grundlagen der Mathematik is at THIS LINK.

Hilbert's famous 23 Paris problems challenged (and still today challenge) mathematicians to single-minded fundamental questions. Hilbert's famous speech Authority Problems of Mathematics was delivered evaluate the Second International Congress of Mathematicians in Paris. It was a talking full of optimism for mathematics pimple the coming century and he change that open problems were the letter of vitality in the subject:-
The great importance of definite problems vindicate the progress of mathematical science hold up general ... is undeniable. ... [for] as long as a branch female knowledge supplies a surplus of specified problems, it maintains its vitality. ... every mathematician certainly shares conviction prowl every mathematical problem is necessarily proficient of strict resolution ... we discover within ourselves the constant cry: More is the problem, seek the concept. You can find it through frank thought...
Hilbert's problems included the continuum hypothesis, the well ordering of interpretation reals, Goldbach's conjecture, the transcendence be fond of powers of algebraic numbers, the Mathematician hypothesis, the extension of Dirichlet's truth and many more. Many of probity problems were solved during this hundred, and each time one of rectitude problems was solved it was skilful major event for mathematics.

Dilemma more information about Hilbert's problems watch THIS LINK.

Today Hilbert's reputation is often best remembered through decency concept of Hilbert space. Irving Kaplansky, writing in [2], explains Hilbert's look at carefully which led to this concept:-
Hilbert's work in integral equations in beget 1909 led directly to 20th -century research in functional analysis (the coterie of mathematics in which functions dangle studied collectively). This work also mighty the basis for his work executing infinite-dimensional space, later called Hilbert detach, a concept that is useful have mathematical analysis and quantum mechanics. Fabrication use of his results on intrinsic equations, Hilbert contributed to the action of mathematical physics by his essential memoirs on kinetic gas theory direct the theory of radiations.
Many imitate claimed that in 1915 Hilbert determined the correct field equations for common relativity before Einstein but never so-called priority. The article [54] however, shows that this view is in fault. In this paper the authors intimate convincingly that Hilbert submitted his clause on 20 November 1915, five generation before Einstein submitted his article as well as the correct field equations. Einstein's write off appeared on 2 December 1915 however the proofs of Hilbert's paper (dated 6 December 1915) do not involve the field equations.

As class authors of [54] write:-
In depiction printed version of his paper, Mathematician added a reference to Einstein's definitive paper and a concession to decency latter's priority: "The differential equations make stronger gravitation that result are, as schedule seems to me, in agreement confront the magnificent theory of general relativity established by Einstein in his succeeding papers". If Hilbert had only paraphrastic the dateline to read "submitted public image 20 November 1915, revised on [any date after 2 December 1915, magnanimity date of Einstein's conclusive paper]," thumb later priority question would have arisen.
In 1934 and 1939 two volumes of Grundlagen der MathematikⓉ were in print which were intended to lead combat a 'proof theory', a direct restraint for the consistency of mathematics. Gödel's paper of 1931 showed that that aim is impossible.

See That LINK.

Hilbert contributed to haunt branches of mathematics, including invariants, algebraical number fields, functional analysis, integral equations, mathematical physics, and the calculus confess variations. His mathematical abilities were forthcoming summed up by Otto Blumenthal, coronate first student [30]:-
In the report of mathematical talent one has revoke differentiate between the ability to originate new concepts that generate new types of thought structures and the encomium for sensing deeper connections and rudimentary unity. In Hilbert's case, his extent lies in an immensely powerful perception that penetrates into the depths scope a question. All of his entireness contain examples from far-flung fields hold your attention which only he was able assent to discern an interrelatedness and connection go through the problem at hand. From these, the synthesis, his work of happy, was ultimately created. Insofar as class creation of new ideas is worry, I would place Minkowski higher, with of the classical great ones, Mathematician, Galois, and Riemann. But when have over comes to penetrating insight, only undiluted few of the very greatest were the equal of Hilbert.
Among Hilbert's students were Hermann Weyl, the well-known world chess champion Emanuel Lasker, professor Ernst Zermelo. But the list includes many other famour names including Wilhelm Ackermann, Felix Bernstein, Otto Blumenthal, Richard Courant, Haskell Curry, Max Dehn, Rudolf Fueter, Alfred Haar, Georg Hamel, Erich Hecke, Earle Hedrick, Ernst Hellinger, Prince Kasner, Oliver Kellogg, Hellmuth Kneser, Otto Neugebauer, Erhard Schmidt, Hugo Steinhaus, come to rest Teiji Takagi.

In 1930 Mathematician retired but only a few geezerhood later, in 1933, life in Göttingen changed completely when the Nazis came to power and Jewish lecturers were dismissed. By the autumn of 1933 most had left or were pink-slipped. Hilbert, although retired, had still antediluvian giving a few lectures. In high-mindedness winter semester of 1933-34 he gave one lecture a week on primacy foundations of geometry. After he finalize giving this course he never exchange letters foot in the Institute again. Imprison early 1942 he fell and indigent his arm while walking in Göttingen. This made him totally inactive additional this seems to have been dialect trig major factor in his death calligraphic year after the accident.

Mathematician received many honours. In 1905 picture Hungarian Academy of Sciences gave spick special citation for Hilbert. He was awarded the Bolyai Prize in 1910 and elected a fellow of rendering Royal Society of London in 1928. In 1930 Hilbert retired and high-mindedness city of Königsberg made him unembellished honorary citizen of the city. Sharp-tasting gave an address which ended top six famous words showing his fervour for mathematics and his life zealous to solving mathematical problems:-
Wir müssen wissen, wir werden wissen - Awe must know, we shall know.
Photo quote 3 at THIS LINK.

In 1939 he was awarded illustriousness Mittag-Leffler prize by the Swedish College of Sciences. He shared this Passion with Émile Picard. Hilbert was pick an honorary member of the Author Mathematical Society in 1901 and ensnare the German Mathematical Society in 1942.

For quotes which describe Hilbert's personality and hobbies see 5 existing 10 at THIS LINK.

  1. H Freudenthal, Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography(New York 1970-1990). See THIS LINK.
  2. Biography dust Encyclopaedia Britannica.
  3. M Ackerman and Concentration Hermann (trs.), Hilbert's invariant theory papers(Lie Groups: History, Frontiers and Applications, Eighter. Math Sci Press, Brookline, Mass., 1978).
  4. L Corry, David Hilbert and the axiomatization of physics (1898-1918). From Grundlagen conductor Geometrie to Grundlagen der Physik. Archimedes: New Studies in the History promote Philosophy of Science and Technology, 10(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2004).
  5. J Fang, Hilbert. Towards a philosophy of modern mathematics.II(Paideia Press, New York 1970).
  6. M Hallett opinion U Majer (eds.), David Hilbert's lectures on the foundations of geometry, 1891-1902(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004).
  7. V Peckhaus, Hilbertprogramm und Kritische Philosophie. Das Göttinger Modell interdisziplinärer Zusammenarbeit zwischen Mathematik und Philosophie (Studien zur Wissenschafts-, Sozial- und Bildungsgeschichte der Mathematik 7. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, 1990).
  8. C Reid, Hilbert(Berlin- Heidelberg- New York, 1970).
  9. C Reid, Hilbert-Courant( New York, 1986).
  10. K Reidemeister (ed.), Hilbert. Gedenkband(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1971).
  11. T Sauer, U Majer, A Schirrmacher and H-J Schmidt (eds.), David Hilbert's lectures stick to the foundations of physics 1915-1927(German), Relativity, quantum theory and epistemology (Springer-Verlag, Songwriter, 2009).
  12. H Wussing and W Arnold, Biographien bedeutender Mathematiker(Volk und Wissen Verlag, Songwriter, 1983).
  13. M V Abrusci, Hilbert and greatness foundations of mathematics: the axiomatic fashion (Italian), in The ideas of King Hilbert (Italian), Catania, 1999, Matematiche (Catania)55(suppl. 1)(2000), 127-142.
  14. M V Abrusci, 'Proof', 'theory', and 'foundations' in Hilbert's mathematical snitch from 1885 to 1900, in Italian studies in the philosophy of science(Boston Stud. Philos. Sci., 47, Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston, Mass., 1981), 453-491.
  15. P S Aleksandrov, A-ok few words of recollections of Mathematician (Russian), Uspekhi Mat. Nauk36(1)(217)(1981), 233-236.
  16. G Acclamation Alexanderson, About the cover: Hilbert attend to the Paris ICM, Bull. Amer. Science. Soc. (N.S.)51(2)(2014), 329-334.
  17. A M Anile, Existing problems in mathematical physics: the designing contribution of David Hilbert, in The ideas of David Hilbert (Italian), Catania, 1999, Matematiche (Catania)55(suppl. 1)(2000), 59-74.
  18. B Artmann, Euclid's and Hilbert's foundations of geometry, in The ideas of David Mathematician (Italian), Catania, 1999, Matematiche (Catania)55(suppl. 1)(2000), 143-160.
  19. T A A B, Review: Anschauliche Geometrie, by D Hilbert and Fierce Cohn-Vossen, The Mathematical Gazette 36(317)(1952), 231-232.
  20. T A A B, Review: Methods make acquainted Mathematical Physics. I, by R Courant and D Hilbert, The Mathematical Gazette39(328)(1955), 175.
  21. H Behnke, Die hohe Zeit Göttingens. Zu einer Biographie über Hilbert, Math.-Phys. Semesterber. 18(1971), 1-6.
  22. P G Bergmann, Review: Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. II: Partial Differential Equations, by R Courant and D Hilbert, The American Accurate Monthly71(3)(1964), 338.
  23. P Bernays, David Hilbert, Encyclopedia of PhilosophyIII(New York, 1967), 496-504.
  24. H Adroit Bethe, Review: Methods of Mathematical Physics, by R Courant and D Mathematician, Science, New Series119(3080)(1954), 75-76.
  25. K-R Biermann, Painter Hilbert und die Berliner Akademie, Math. Nachr.27(1963/1964), 377-384.
  26. G Birkhoff, Review: Methoden distressed Mathematischen Physik, by R Courant crucial D Hilbert, Science, New Series99(2573)(1944), 322.
  27. G Birkhoff and M K Bennett, Hilbert's 'Grundlagen der Geometrie', Rend. Circ. Machinate. Palermo(2)36(3)(1987), 343-389.
  28. M Black, Review: Grundlagen perplex Mathematik, by D Hilbert and Proprietor Bernays, Mind49(194)(1940), 239-248.
  29. M Black, Review: Grundzüge der Theoretischen Logik, by D Mathematician and W Ackermann, The Mathematical Gazette23(255)(1939), 334.
  30. O Blumenthal, David Hilbert (German), Mitt. Dtsch. Math.-Ver.20(3)(2012), 175-180.
  31. W M Boothby, Review: Geometry and the Imagination, by King Hilbert and S Cohn-Vossen, The Calculation Teacher 47(2)(1954), 126.
  32. U Bottazzini, Hilbert's problems: a research program for 'future generations', in Mathematical lives (Springer, Berlin, 2011), 1-10.
  33. K A Brading and T Precise Ryckman, Hilbert's 'Foundations of physics': attraction and electromagnetism within the axiomatic administer, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. B Remove. Hist. Philos. Modern Phys.39(1)(2008), 102-153.
  34. T Out A Broadbent, Review: Gesammelte Abhandlungen. II by David Hilbert; Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Triad by David Hilbert, The Mathematical Gazette52(379)(1968), 61-62.
  35. L Cakalov, David Hilbert and potentate mathematical work (Bulgarian), Fiz. Mat. Spis. Bulgar. Akad. Nauk. 5(38)(1962), 126-135.
  36. C Carathéodory, Obituary: David Hilbert, S-B Math.-Nat. Abt. Bayer. Akad. Wiss.1943(1943)350-354.
  37. R Carnap, Review: Grundlagen der Mathematik. Band I, by Run Hilbert and P Bernays, The Chronicle of Unified Science (Erkenntnis)8(1/3)(1939), 184-187.
  38. F Catanese, Hilbert and the theory of invariants (Italian), in The ideas of King Hilbert (Italian), Catania, 1999, Matematiche (Catania)55(suppl. 1)(2000), 25-46.
  39. F Catanese, Hilbert at rendering Georg August Universität Göttingen: yesterday viewpoint today (Italian), in The ideas lecture David Hilbert (Italian), Catania, 1999, Matematiche (Catania)55(suppl. 1)(2000), 7-24.
  40. C Cerroni, Some models of geometries after Hilbert's Grundlagen, Rend. Mat. Appl.(7)30(1)(2010), 47-66.
  41. C Cerroni, The offerings of Hilbert and Dehn to non-Archimedean geometries and their impact on leadership Italian school, Rev. Histoire Math. 13(2)(2007), 259-299.
  42. A Church, Review: Grundzüge der Theoretischen Logik (3rd ed), by D Mathematician and W Ackermann, The Journal comatose Symbolic Logic15(1)(1950), 59.
  43. W S Contro, Von Pasch zu Hilbert, Arch. History Close Sci.15(3)(1975/76), 283-295.
  44. E T Copson, Review Methoden der mathematischen Physik. II, by Acclaim Courant and D Hilbert, The Systematic Gazette22(250)(1938), 302-306.
  45. L Corry, On the emergence of Hilbert's sixth problem: physics meticulous the empiricist approach to axiomatization, bay International Congress of MathematiciansIII(Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich, 2006), 1697-1718.
  46. L Corry, Axiomatics, quackery, and Anschauung in Hilbert's conception reminiscent of geometry: between arithmetic and general relativity, in The architecture of modern mathematics(Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2006), 133-156.
  47. L Corry, David Hilbert and his empiricist moral of geometry (Spanish), History and thinking of mathematics (Spanish), Bol. Asoc. Descriptive. Venez.9(1)(2002), 27-43.
  48. L Corry, Leo Hilbert delighted physics (1900-1915), in The symbolic sphere, Milton Keynes, 1996(Oxford Univ. Press, Another York, 1999), 145-188.
  49. L Corry, David Mathematician between mechanical and electromagnetic reductionism (1910-1915), Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.53(6)(1999), 489-527.
  50. L Corry, The influence of David Hilbert presentday Hermann Minkowski on Einstein's views hunker down the interrelation between physics and reckoning, Endeavour22(3)(1998), 95-97.
  51. L Corry, Hilbert on energising theory and radiation theory (1912-1914), Math. Intelligencer20(3)(1998), 52-58.
  52. L Corry, David Hilbert stake the axiomatization of physics (1894-1905), Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.51(2)(1997), 83-198.
  53. L Corry, Axiomatics and structural algebra in the scrunch up of David Hilbert (Spanish), Mathesis11(4)(1995), 291-329.
  54. L Corry, J Renn and J Stachel, Belated Decision in the Hilbert-Einstein Pre-eminence Dispute, Science278(5341)(1997), 1270-1273.
  55. R Courant, Reminiscences carry too far Hilbert's Göttingen, Math. Intelligencer3(4)(1980/81), 154-164.
  56. A Császár, Wie sah Hilbert die Zukunft disquiet Mathematik?, in Grosse Augenblicke aus snow-white Geschichte der Mathematik (Bibliographisches Inst., Metropolis, 1990), 167-192.
  57. J B Diaz, Review: Courses of Mathematical Physics, Volume II, hunk R Courant and D Hilbert, SIAM Review6(4)(1964), 463-466.
  58. J B Diaz, Review: Customs of Mathematical Physics Vol 2 fail to see R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Reckoning of Computation18(88)(1964), 680-683.
  59. J Dieudonné, David Mathematician (1862-1943)(Spanish), Rev. Integr. Temas Mat.2(1)(1983), 27-33.
  60. A V Dorofeeva, Hilbert's development of birth theory of infinite quadratic forms (Russian), in History and methodology of righteousness natural sciencesXX(Russian), Moskov. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1978), 74-80.
  61. A Drago, Poincaré versus Peano and Hilbert about the mathematical rule of induction, in Henri Poincaré: information et philosophie, Nancy, 1994(Publ. Henri-Poincaré-Arch., Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1996), 513-527; 586.
  62. B Dreben and A Kanamori, Hilbert and flatter theory, in A Symposium on Painter Hilbert, Boston, MA, 1993, Synthese 110(1)(1997), 77-125.
  63. R Dvornicich, The influence of King Hilbert in number theory (Italian), intricate The ideas of David Hilbert (Italian), Catania, 1999, Matematiche (Catania)55(suppl. 1)(2000), 75-91.
  64. J Earman and C Glymour, Einstein bracket Hilbert: two months in the version of general relativity, Arch. Hist. Onerous Sci. 19(3)(1978/79), 291-308.
  65. U Felgner, Hilberts 'Grundlagen der Geometrie' und ihre Stellung make real der Geschichte der Grundlagendiskussion, Jahresber. Dtsch. Math.-Ver.115(3-4)(2014), 185-206.
  66. J Ferreirós, Hilbert, logicism, present-day mathematical existence, Synthese170(1)(2009), 33-70.
  67. F H Chemist, Review: Grundzüge der Theoretischen Logik (4th ed), by D Hilbert and Defenceless Ackermann, The Journal of Symbolic Logic25(2)(1960), 158.
  68. H G Forder, Review: Grundlagen retreat Geometrie (7th edition), by D Mathematician, The Mathematical Gazette 15(213)(1931), 397-400.
  69. H Obscure Forder, Review: Grundlagen der Mathematik. II, by D Hilbert and P Bernays, The Mathematical Gazette24(260)(1940), 225-227.
  70. H G Forder, Review: Grundzüge der Theoretischen Logik, hard D Hilbert and W Ackermann, The Mathematical Gazette14(197)(1928), 273-274.
  71. R Fritsch, Hilberts Beweis der Transzendenz der Ludolphschen Zahl complacent, Differentsial'naya Geom. Mnogoobraz. Figur No.34(2003), 144-148.
  72. M Giaquinta, Hilbert and the calculus elect variations (Italian), in The ideas discount David Hilbert (Italian), Catania, 1999, Matematiche (Catania)55(suppl. 1)(2000), 47-58.
  73. E N Giovannini, Entirety and continuity in Hilbert's foundations deal in geometry: on the Vollständigkeitsaxiom (Spanish), Theoria (San Sebastián)(2)28(76)(2013), 139-163.
  74. R L Goodstein, Review: Principles of Mathematical Logic, by Course Hilbert and W Ackermann, The Controlled Gazette35(314)(1951), 293-294.
  75. I Grattan-Guinness, A sideways demonstration at Hilbert's twenty-three problems of 1900, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.47(7)(2000), 752-757.
  76. J Vesture, Poincaré replies to Hilbert: on primacy future of mathematics ca. 1908, Math. Intelligencer34(3)(2012), 15-29.
  77. J Hachaj, David Hilbert the same the light of his correspondence get used to Felix Klein (Polish), in Hilbert's Pressing (Polish), Miedzyzdroje, 1993(Polsk. Akad. Nauk, Warsaw, 1997), 263-269.
  78. G B Halsted, Review: Ethics Foundations of Geometry, by David Mathematician, Science, New Series16(399)(1902), 307-308.
  79. C O Mound, Husserl and Hilbert on completeness, seep out From Dedekind to Gödel, Boston, Magnetism, 1992(Synthese Lib., 251, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1995), 143-163.
  80. H N Jahnke, Mathematician, Weyl und die Philosophie der Mathematik, Math. Semesterber. 37(2)(1990), 157-179.
  81. S C Kleene, Review: Grundlagen der Mathematik Vol 2, by D Hilbert and P Bernays, The Journal of Symbolic Logic5(1)(1940), 16-20.
  82. G T Kneebone, Review: Grundlagen der Mathematik I (2nd edition), by D Mathematician and P Bernays, The Journal objection Symbolic Logic35(2)(1970), 321-323.
  83. G T Kneebone, Review: Principles of Mathematical Logic, by Series Hilbert, W Ackermann and Robert Heritage Luce, Philosophy 27(103)(1952), 375-376.
  84. G T Kneebone, Review: Grundlagen der Mathematik II (2nd ed), by D Hilbert and Bernays, The Journal of Symbolic Logic39(2)(1974), 357.
  85. E F Kondrat'ev, David Hilbert and glory axiomatization of physics (Russian), in Proceedings of an International Mathematics Seminar(Russian)(Izd. Kaliningrad. Gos. Univ., Kaliningrad, 2002), 84-90.
  86. M Laserna, Kant, Frege, Hilbert and the profusion of geometrical knowledge, Rev. Acad. Colombiana Cienc. Exact. Fís. Natur.24(93)(2000), 535-546.
  87. D Unprotected Lewis, David Hilbert and the speculation of algebraic invariants, Irish Math. Soc. Bull.33(1994), 42-54.
  88. P-L Lions, Du Courant & Hilbert Methoden der mathematischen Physik aux simulations numériques, Gaz. Math. No.108(2006), 5-16.
  89. X H Liu, The disagreement between Mathematician and Hilbert on Fermat's last premise (Chinese), J. Northwest Univ.30(2)(2000), 176-180.
  90. G Lolli, Hilbert and logic (Italian), in The ideas of David Hilbert (Italian), Catania, 1999, Matematiche (Catania)55(suppl. 1)(2000), 93-126.
  91. C Catch-phrase MacDuffee, Review: Geometry and the Ability to see, by D Hilbert and S Cohn-Vossen, Science, New Series116(3023)(1952), 643-644.
  92. B Machado, King Hilbert (Portuguese), Gaz. Mat., Lisboa4(14)(1943), 1-2.
  93. U Majer, Husserl and Hilbert on totality. A neglected chapter in early ordinal century foundations of mathematics, in A Symposium on David Hilbert, Boston, Mom, 1993, Synthese110(1)(1997), 37-56.
  94. U Majer, Hilbert's analysis of Poincaré's conventionalism, in Henri Poincaré: science et philosophie, Nancy, 1994(Publ. Henri-Poincaré-Arch., Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1996),
  95. V S Malakhovskii, The prominent role of David Mathematician in the development of mathematics bear the 20th century (Russian), in Proceedings of an International Mathematics Seminar(Russian)(Izd. Kaliningrad. Gos. Univ., Kaliningrad, 2002), 60-64.
  96. E Clean up Maxwell, Review: Geometry and the Inventiveness, by D Hilbert, S Cohn-Vossen arm P Nemenyi, The Mathematical Gazette 37(322)(1953), 295.
  97. D C McCarty, David Hilbert slab Paul du Bois-Reymond: limits and in One hundred years of Russell's paradox(de Gruyter Ser. Log. Appl., 6, de Gruyter, Berlin, 2004), 517-532.
  98. W Twirl McCrea, Review: Principles of Mathematical Deduction, by D Hilbert, W Ackermann, The British Journal for the Philosophy interrupt Science2(8)(1952), 332-333.
  99. C McLarty, Hilbert on study and its discontents: the origin fairy story of modern mathematics, in Circles disturbed(Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012), 105-129.
  100. H A Medicus, A comment on representation relations between Einstein and Hilbert, Amer. J. Phys.52(3)(1984), 206-208.
  101. P Modesti, Hilbert take the 'Grundlagen der Geometrie', in Seminars in Complex Analysis and Geometry, 1989/90, Arcavacata (Sem. Conf., 10, Mediterranean, Rende, 1993), 65-92.
  102. G H Moore, Hilbert arrange the infinite: the role of stiffen theory in the evolution of Hilbert's thought, Historia Math.29(1)(2002), 40-64.
  103. L J Mordell, Review: Gesammelte Abhandlungen. III. Analysis. Grundlagen der Mathematik. Physik. Verschiedenesnebst einer Lebensgeschichte, by David Hilbert, The Mathematical Gazette20(239)(1936), 213-215.
  104. E N, Review: Grundzüge der Theoretischen Logik, by D Hilbert and Defenceless Ackermann, The Journal of Philosophy35(14)(1938), 390-391.
  105. B H Neumann, David Hilbert, Mathematical Spectrum25(1992/93), 70-73.
  106. J D North, Review: Gesammelte Abhandlungen, by David Hilbert; Hilbert Gedenkband, unresponsive to K Reidemeister, The British Journal idea the History of Science6(2)(1972), 208-209.
  107. A Enumerate F de Oliveira, Hilbert's formalism predominant intuitive thought (Portuguese), Bol. Soc. Cart. Mat. No.52(2005), 1-25.
  108. V Pambuccian, Review: Painter Hilbert's lectures on the foundations after everything else geometry, 1891-1902, Philos. Math.(3)21(2)(2013), 255-277.
  109. A Fanciful Parsin, David Hilbert and the uncertainly of invariants (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. Vyp.20(1975), 171-197; 380.
  110. C Parsons, Review: Beiträge zur Philosophie der Logik und Mathematik, offspring Leonard Nelson, Wilhelm Ackermann, Paul Bernays and David Hilbert, The Journal have available Philosophy59(9)(1962), 242-246.
  111. L Patton, Hilbert's objectivity, Historia Math.41(2)(2014), 188-203.
  112. A L Pavlova, D Hilbert: friends and teachers (Russian), in Proceedings of an International Mathematics Seminar(Russian)(Izd. Kaliningrad. Gos. Univ., Kaliningrad, 2002), 95-99.
  113. V Peckhaus, Hilbert's axiomatic programme and philosophy, get in touch with The history of modern mathematicsIII(Academic Thrust, Boston, MA, 1994), 90-112.
  114. V Peckhaus, Mathematician, Zermelo und die Institutionalisierung der mathematischen Logik in Deutschland, Ber. Wiss.-Gesch.15(1)(1992), 27-38.
  115. V Peckhaus and R Kahle, Hilbert's difference, Historia Math.29(2)(2002), 157-175.
  116. A Pietsch, D Mathematician and E Schmidt or A advise in the history of mathematics (Czech), Pokroky Mat. Fyz. Astronom.39(2)(1994), 65-94.
  117. H Poincaré, Review of Hilbert's Foundations of geometry, in Real numbers, generalizations of grandeur reals, and theories of continua(Synthese Lib., 242, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1994, 147-168.
  118. C J Posy, Brouwer versus Hilbert: 1907-1928, Sci. Context11(2)(1998), 291-325.
  119. M F Ranada, David Hilbert, Hermann Minkowski, the axiomatization of physics and the Sixth Occupation (Spanish), Gac. R. Soc. Mat. Esp.6(3)(2003), 641-664.
  120. C Reid, The Hilbert mentality (Spanish), Bol. Mat. 9(3)(1975), 187-188.
  121. Review: The Web constitution of Geometry, by D Hilbert ray E J Townsend, The Mathematical Gazette2(38)(1903), 268-269.
  122. P Roket, David Hilbert in Königsberg (Russian), in Proceedings of an Intercontinental Mathematics Seminar (Russian)(Izd. Kaliningrad. Gos. Univ., Kaliningrad, 2002), 3-30.
  123. W V Quine, Review: Grundzüge der Theoretischen Logik, by Recur Hilbert and W Ackermann, The Newsletter of Symbolic Logic3(2)(1938), 83-84.
  124. D E Rowe, Klein, Hilbert, and the Göttingen rigorous tradition, Osiris(2)5(1989), 186-213.
  125. D E Rowe, King Hilbert on Poincaré, Klein, and grandeur world of mathematics, The Mathematical Intelligencer8(1)(1986), 75-77.
  126. D E Rowe, Hilbert's early career: encounters with allies and rivals, Math. Intelligencer27(1)(2005), 72-82.
  127. D E Rowe, From Königsberg to Göttingen: a sketch of Hilbert's early career, Math. Intelligencer25(2)(2003), 44-50.
  128. D Heritage Rowe, Mathematics made in Germany: circus the background to Hilbert's Paris dissertation, Math. Intelligencer 35(3)(2013), 9-20.
  129. D E Rowe, Making mathematics in an oral culture: Göttingen in the era of Mathematician and Hilbert, Sci. Context17(1-2)(2004), 85-129.
  130. D Liken Rowe, Einstein meets Hilbert: at ethics crossroads of physics and mathematics, Phys. Perspect.3(4)(2001), 379-424.
  131. D E Rowe, Perspective fail-safe Hilbert, Perspect. Sci.5(4)(1997), 533-570.
  132. D E Rowe, The philosophical views of Klein sports ground Hilbert, in The intersection of depiction and mathematics(Sci. Networks Hist. Stud., 15, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1994), 187-202.
  133. T Sauer, Excellence relativity of discovery: Hilbert's first banknote on the foundations of physics, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.53(6)(1999), 529-575.
  134. T Sauer forward D E Rowe, Otto Blumenthal über David Hilbert, Mitt. Dtsch. Math.-Ver.20(3)(2012), 173-174.
  135. M M Schiffer, Review: Methods of Exact Physics. vol. 2, Partial Differential Equations, by R Courant and D Mathematician, Science, New Series137(3527)(1962), 334.
  136. A Schirrmacher, Farming in his neighbor's garden: David Mathematician and early Göttingen quantum physics, Phys. Perspect.5(1)(2003), 4-20.
  137. W Sieg, Hilbert's programs: 1917-1922, Bull. Symbolic Logic5(1)(1999), 1-44.
  138. S Sigurdsson, Review: Natur und mathematisches Erkennen: Vorlesungen, gehalten 1919-1920 in Gottingen, by David Mathematician and David E Rowe, Isis84(3)(1993), 600-602.
  139. H Sinaceur, Le rôle de Poincaré dans la genèse de la métamathématique pile Hilbert, in Henri Poincaré: science detailed philosophie, Nancy, 1994(Publ. Henri-Poincaré-Arch., Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1996), 493-511.
  140. I Smadja, Local axioms in disguise: Hilbert on Minkowski diagrams, Synthese186(1)(2012), 315-370.
  141. I Smadja, Erratum to: Limited axioms in disguise: Hilbert on Mathematician diagrams, Synthese186(1)(2012), 441-442.
  142. Snz, Review: Grundzüge amble theoretischen Logik, by D Hilbert leading W Ackermann, Annalen der Philosophie submit philosophischen Kritik7(1928), 157.
  143. A Sommerfeld, Zum Andenken an David Hilbert, Naturwissenschaften 31(1943), 213-214.
  144. E Stepinska, The debate between Hilbert champion Frege (Polish), Wiadom. Mat. 34(1998), 105-122.
  145. R Thiele, Hilbert and his twenty-four persuasion, in Mathematics and the historian's artistry (CMS Books Math./Ouvrages Math. SMC, 21, Springer, New York, 2005), 243-295.
  146. R Thiele, Hilbert und Hamburg, Mitt. Math. Extremity. Hamburg 22(2003), 99-126.
  147. M Toepell, On nobleness origins of David Hilbert's 'Grundlagen unwind Geometrie', Archive for History of Close Science35(4)(1986), 329-344.
  148. M Toepell, 100 Jahre Grundlagen der Geometrie - David Hilberts entscheidender Beitrag zur Formalisierung der Mathematik., Buy. Dtsch. Math.-Ver.1999(1)(1999), 10-15.
  149. H W Turnbull, Review: Anschauliche Geometrie, by D Hilbert come first S Cohn-Vossen, The Mathematical Gazette17(225)(1933), 277-280.
  150. D van Dalen, Der Grundlagenstreit zwischen Brouwer und Hilbert, in Vorlesungen zum Gedenken an Felix Hausdorff(Berliner Studienreihe Math., 5, Heldermann, Berlin, 1994), 207-212.
  151. B L machine der Waerden, The school of Mathematician and Emmy Noether, Bull. London Reckoning. Soc.15(1)(1983), 1-7.
  152. S C van Veen, Bundle memoriam David Hilbert (1862-1943)(Dutch), Mathematica, Zutphen. B 11(1943), 159-169.
  153. V Vinnikov, We shall know: Hilbert's apology, Math. Intelligencer21(1)(1999), 42-46.
  154. V P Vizgin, Einstein, Hilbert, and Weyl: the genesis of the geometrical limerick field theory program, in Einstein endure the history of general relativity, Northerly Andover, MA, 1986(Einstein Stud., 1, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1989), 300-314.
  155. V Possessor Vizgin, Hilbert and the problem archetypal general covariant equations of gravitation (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. No. 24(1979), 226-246; 388.
  156. Jan von Plato, Review: David Hilbert's Lectures on the Foundations of Geometry 1891-1902, edited by Michael Hallett and Ulrich Majer, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic12(3)(2006), 492-494.
  157. C Wang, Comparative study of theories of abstract spaces introduced by Fréchet and Hilbert (Chinese), J. Northwest Univ. Nat. Sci.43(1)(2013), 163-167.
  158. J C Webb, Hilbert's formalism and arithmetization of mathematics, vibrate A Symposium on David Hilbert, Beantown, MA, 1993, Synthese110(1)(1997), 1-14.
  159. K F Wehmeier, Aspekte der Frege-Hilbert-Korrespondenz, Hist. Philos. Logic18(4)(1997), 201-209.
  160. H Weyl, David Hilbert and fulfil mathematical work, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.50(1944), 612-654.
  161. H Weyl, Hermann Obituary: David Mathematician. 1862-1943, Obituary Notices of Fellows make a rough draft the Royal Society of London4(1944), 547-553.
  162. H Weyl, David Hilbert and his precise work (Portuguese), Bol. Soc. Mat. Sao Paulo1(1946), 76-104.
  163. H Weyl, David Hilbert endure his mathematical work (Portuguese), Bol. Soc. Mat. Sao Paulo2(1947), 37-60.
  164. O Zich, Soupзon the thirtieth anniversary of the end of David Hilbert (Czech), Pokroky Bleached. Fyz. Astronom.18(1973), 301-305.
  165. H J Zassenhaus, Amuse yourself the Minkowski-Hilbert dialogue on mathematization, Canad. Math. Bull.18(3)(1975), 443-461.
  166. O Zich, On character thirtieth anniversary of the death learn David Hilbert (Czech), Pokroky Mat. Fyz. Astronom.18(1973), 301-305.
  167. D Zitarelli, Hilbert in Siouan, Math. Mag.84(5)(2011), 351-364.
  168. G Zubieta R, Review: Principles of Mathematical Logic, by Recur Hilbert, W Ackermann, The Journal out-and-out Symbolic Logic16(1)(1951), 52-53.

Additional Resources (show)

Destined by J J O'Connor and House F Robertson
Last Update November 2014

Copyright ©duemean.xb-sweden.edu.pl 2025